Has Pete Sampras played Roger Federer?
Perhaps the vast majority of the people reading this article are fortunate enough to have seen both Pete Sampras and Roger Federer play, although never against each other in their prime. These two geniuses clashed only once, at the 2001 Wimbledon, when the Swiss prevailed in five sets in the round of 16.
Are Sampras and Federer friends?
Wimbledon: Roger Federer and Pete Sampras form strong friendship.
Is Pete Sampras the greatest of all time?
In the 1990s, Pete Sampras was called the greatest tennis player of all time. Now, “Pistol Pete” is passing the intangible title on to Novak Djokovic.
Would Sampras have beaten Federer?
In a recent conference call, Pete Sampras said that Roger Federer doesn’t see true serve and volley players, and no one could beat him in his prime.
How many times did Agassi play Sampras?
With contrasting styles and temperaments, they played each other 34 times from 1989 through 2002, with the head-to-head finishing 20-14 favoring Sampras. It has been named as one of the greatest tennis rivalries of all time.
How Long Has Pete Sampras been married?
Pete Sampras
| Spouse(s) | Bridgette Wilson ( m. 2000) |
| Children | 2 |
| Height | 6 ft 1 in (1.85 m) |
| Turned pro | 1988 |
| Singles |
|---|
Who was better Andre Agassi or Pete Sampras?
Sampras defeated Agassi in straight sets. In one of their matches, at the 2001 US Open quarter-final, Sampras won with the score of 6–7, 7–6, 7–6, 7–6; throughout the match, no player broke the other’s serve….Head-to-head.
| Legend | Agassi | Sampras |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Masters Series | 5 | 5 |
| ATP World / International Series | 4 | 5 |
| Total | 14 | 20 |
Is Djokovic better than Sampras?
Djokovic primarily plays baseline rivals, but it’s a tall order to grind away in a more physical ATP. While Sampras was breaking down by the age of 28, Djokovic is surging ahead with his best play. Sampras had to play against more variety of styles in opponents.
Would Pete Sampras be good today?
If the question is whether Sampras, born 10-20 years later than he was, would be dominant today, it’s impossible to say for sure, but he certainly had the natural athletic ability. Everything would’ve been different: training, conditioning, nutrition, racquets, strings, court speed, etc.. It’s pure conjecture.
